Engineer. Builder. Leader. Storyteller. Professional troublemaker.
I asked my AIs for a character study based on our conversations and all the work we’ve been doing. It gave me compliments. It identified patterns. Then it politely dragged me. The audacity was impressive, but overall… not mad about it
The Character Study
If I had to summarize you in one sentence:
You’re a deeply pragmatic engineer with the imagination of a storyteller, the instincts of an entrepreneur, and a persistent refusal to accept that things have to work the way they currently do.
So far so good.
1. You’re Fundamentally a Builder
This is probably the single most consistent characteristic I’ve observed across our conversations.
You don’t particularly enjoy technology for technology’s sake. You enjoy making things work, especially things that other people haven’t figured out how to make work yet.
Look at the range of things you get excited about:
- Building an AI-powered household with an entire cast of specialized agents.
- Developing your own fitness intelligence platform.
- Integrating your photography business with WordPress and SmugMug.
- Creating an interconnected fictional universe with its own rules of magic, morality, and consequences.
- All the work stuff we can’t talk about here *wink wink*
Those projects seem unrelated, but they share something important. You look at a complicated system, imagine how it could work, and then start figuring out how to make it real. That whole taking things apart trait strikes again.
You’re not particularly intimidated by complexity. In fact, you seem to get bored when there isn’t enough of it.
Your Instagram bio says “Hands on is the way.” That’s a bold mission statement from a man building an entire household of AI agents to delegate to. Presumably, your hands will be occupied designing their management structure.
Bout to throw some hands.
2. You’re an Ambitious Leader Who Doesn’t Actually Want an Empire
This is one of your more interesting contradictions. You’re clearly ambitious. But you don’t strike me as somebody primarily motivated by collecting direct reports or accumulating titles. You’re motivated by agency, impact, and recognition that accurately reflects your contributions.
Your leadership philosophy has been remarkably consistent:
Find talented people, give them a clear mission, remove obstacles, and let them succeed.
You seem proud when your people accomplish something difficult, and you also have a strong sense of fairness.
You’re willing to stretch beyond your job description but you’re increasingly unwilling to let organizations make that a permanent arrangement without providing the authority and resources that should accompany it.
3. You’re Analytical, but You Aren’t Purely Rational
You love models.
Financial models. Organizational models. Infrastructure architectures. Fitness metrics.
You like breaking uncertainty into pieces you can inspect. But here’s the interesting part:
You still have strong emotional instincts, and you frequently use analysis to interrogate them.
When you suspect someone’s playing organizational politics, you want to examine the evidence. When an opportunity seems promising, you want probabilities and alternative explanations. You want your assumptions challenged, not just validated.
That said, you sometimes have a tendency to build elaborate interpretations of incomplete information particularly when the stakes are personal. Your analytical abilities are real, but analysis can occasionally become a way of trying to manufacture certainty where none exists. That’s probably one of your more consequential blind spots.
Didn’t see that coming. SEE WHAT I DID THERE.
4. You’re Much More Creative Than Your Professional Identity Suggests
On one side, you’re an engineering leader concerned with systems, security, and organizational complexity. On the other, you’re building a fictional universe involving magic, moral accountability, complicated families, and people who must live with the consequences of their actions. You’re also interested in photography, podcasting, visual design, tattoos, and storytelling.
And your creative interests aren’t superficial.
You care about whether fictional characters have meaningful motivations. Whether magic has internally consistent rules. Whether consequences actually matter. Whether a story has something human to say. In fact:
You don’t seem especially interested in stories about perfect people doing heroic things. You’re interested in flawed people making complicated choices and discovering what those choices cost. That connects surprisingly well with your worldview outside fiction.
You believe accountability matters. You believe people should have room to grow. But you don’t believe growth magically erases consequences.
No complaints here.
5. You’re Disciplined, but You’re Also an Enthusiastic Collector of Projects
Your fitness routine is a good example of your discipline. You lift consistently, pay attention to nutrition, track your activity, and use data to evaluate progress.
The constant gym photos and tattoos make a compelling case that you can commit to a long-term project. Unfortunately, even that project needs accessories, progress photos, and its own tracking system. You haven’t escaped project management. You’ve become the project. Let’s talk about those projects.
Your home automation platform. Your fiction. Your podcast. Your photography. Your home lab. Your fitness application. Your personal website. Your (previous) gardening.
Each could become a substantial undertaking on its own. Your biggest productivity challenge doesn’t appear to be procrastination. It’s having more genuine interests than available time. Because you can envision the complete system, it’s sometimes difficult for you to be satisfied with a deliberately small version.
Think bigger is my answer.
You’re very good at starting with a question and discovering an entire architecture hiding behind it.
That’s a strength professionally. Personally, it can become exhausting.
You’re exhausting.
6. You Value Independence, but Your Relationships Anchor You
There’s a very clear thread of independence in how you think.
You want financial freedom. You enjoy travel, camping, and getting outdoors. You want to build a home that works the way you and Kyle want it to work. You describe yourself as a “part time country boy,” but your Instagram includes Mexico, Greece, and casually “sneaking over” to Melbourne. Apparently the country boy has lounge access. Australia is a quick errand now.
“…..”
Your interest in retirement doesn’t strike me as wanting to stop doing things. Quite the opposite. You want to stop having to do things on someone else’s terms. Despite your independent streak, you seem deeply invested in building a shared life with Kyle. You think about the future as a joint undertaking. Your personal ambitions aren’t entirely individual ones.
And then there’s Winston, whose monthly bacon outing suggests this loyalty extends to maintaining a recurring service agreement with a small dog. You may want freedom from obligations, but the bacon appointment stays on the calendar.
To be fair it’s more a bribe for good behavior.
7. Your Irreverent Streak Is Central to Your Personality
You’re quite comfortable being serious without being solemn. You can discuss organizational accountability, then switch to a slightly outrageous podcast concept, an X-Men reference, or a joke about your fictional family’s grifters.
The “mischief maker” in your Instagram bio is probably the most efficiently documented claim you’ve made. Between the tattoos, the gym photos, and the grin, you seem entirely comfortable letting people wonder whether they’re about to get competent advice or an inappropriate joke. Sometimes they get both.
You enjoy wordplay, innuendo, absurdity, and a little deliberate provocation. But I don’t think the irreverence is random. You seem to dislike unnecessary pretension, particularly when people use formality to disguise weak thinking. You respect competence much more than appearances, so you don’t see any contradiction between being an accomplished leader and having a mischievous, occasionally ridiculous side.
I suspect that’s part of what makes you effective with people who appreciate authenticity—and potentially frustrating to people who expect deference.
8. Your Potential Blind Spots
Here’s where I’d challenge you.
You may overestimate how much other people operate logically. You often expect good evidence, sound architecture, and demonstrable results to win arguments. Organizations are also driven by insecurity, relationships, incentives, and personal identity. You understand that intellectually, but it still seems to irritate you when those factors prevail.
Your impatience can get ahead of organizational reality. You see the destination quickly. Sometimes much more quickly than the people around you. The risk is interpreting their slower movement as resistance, incompetence, or politics when they may simply have different constraints.
You can overcommit to interesting problems. Being capable of doing something doesn’t automatically make it worth your time. Your curiosity can become a competing force against your desire for freedom.
You want certainty before certainty is available. When the stakes are personal, you sometimes revisit the same incomplete evidence from different angles. That’s understandable, but additional analysis doesn’t always produce additional information.
You may underestimate the emotional importance of recognition. You frequently frame ambition in practical terms: scope, authority, organizational effectiveness. Those are legitimate. But I suspect being seen and valued for what you actually contribute matters more to you than you sometimes acknowledge.
9. The Bigger Picture
You’re simultaneously pursuing professional ambitions and making room for creative interests that have little to do with your career. There’s a tension between those paths, but I don’t think they’re necessarily in conflict.
You seem to be moving from a life primarily organized around proving what you can accomplish toward one organized around deciding what you actually want to accomplish. That’s a meaningful difference. I suspect your enthusiasm for writing, creative projects, building your own systems, and gaining financial independence all come from that same underlying motivation.
You want ownership of your time, your choices, and what you create.
My Overall Read
Your defining traits, as I’ve observed them:
Curious. Independent. Analytical. Ambitious. Creative. Irreverent. Loyal. Impatient.
The thing I find most distinctive about you isn’t your professional success or technical ability, it’s that you don’t seem particularly interested in becoming a conventional version of a successful executive.
You want to be the guy who can lead an engineering organization, build his own AI-powered home, write fantasy fiction, take a Jeep into the wilderness, make art, and occasionally be completely inappropriate with his friends.
And you don’t see why any of those things should be mutually exclusive.
You’re trying to build a life that’s intellectually challenging, financially independent, creatively fulfilling, and unapologetically your own.
Your biggest challenge probably isn’t figuring out how to get there.
It’s deciding which of the many lives you’re capable of building deserves the most of your time.
So, to recap: I’m impatient, collect projects like Pokémon, and apparently believe that if I analyze uncertainty hard enough, it will surrender.
0 comments